{"id":105,"date":"2022-04-13T14:58:55","date_gmt":"2022-04-13T14:58:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.godefy.com\/?p=105"},"modified":"2022-04-18T04:17:32","modified_gmt":"2022-04-18T04:17:32","slug":"according-dubious-research-published-elon-muck-uses-a-twitter-botnet-to-pump-stock-prices","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.godefy.com\/according-dubious-research-published-elon-muck-uses-a-twitter-botnet-to-pump-stock-prices\/","title":{"rendered":"According Dubious Research Elon Musk Uses A Twitter Botnet To Pump Stock Prices"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Yesterday, LA Times published<\/a> an article arguing that Twitter botnets helped Elon Musk build the cult of Tesla. Even speculating that Musk may have created or operated these botnets. However, experts were skeptical of the research. The article uses a tool called Botometer to determine what accounts are bots. The problem is Botometer is fundamentally unreliable. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Over a year ago Florian Gallwitz<\/a>, Professor of computer science and media at Nuremberg Institute of Technology pointed out how flawed Botometer<\/a> is for research. In response to the LA Times OpEd Gallwitz Twetted, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Some @Botometer<\/a> scores for Elon Musk. Screenshots taken just a few minutes apart. This is the tool the “social bot” pseudoscience and hundreds of “scientific” papers were built on.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Some @Botometer<\/a> scores for Elon Musk. Screenshots taken just a few minutes apart. This is the tool the "social bot" pseudoscience and hundreds of "scientific" papers were built on. pic.twitter.com\/fANsVFk9wj<\/a><\/p>— Florian Gallwitz (@FlorianGallwitz) April 12, 2022<\/a><\/blockquote>