{"id":189,"date":"2023-02-10T22:01:17","date_gmt":"2023-02-10T22:01:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.godefy.com\/?p=189"},"modified":"2023-02-10T22:02:33","modified_gmt":"2023-02-10T22:02:33","slug":"silicon-valley-needed-gawker-media","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.godefy.com\/silicon-valley-needed-gawker-media\/","title":{"rendered":"Silicon Valley Needed Gawker Media"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

With the\u00a0recent death of Gawker 2.0, I want to explain how the first Gawker acted as a flawed guardian of the startup world.

Perhaps Valleywag maintained a balance of power between the worst behavior in the startup world and everyone else. Only some investor-enabled psychopathic founders fail to the level of Theranos. The ecosystem was healthier when startups had a chance for headlines they didn’t want.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read full story<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

With the recent death of Gawker 2.0, I want to explain how the first Gawker acted as a flawed guardian of the startup world.https:\/\/t.co\/fRqnGoA91r<\/a><\/p>— Mason Pelt (@masonpelt) February 7, 2023<\/a><\/blockquote>