Today’s links CDA 230 bans Facebook from blocking interoperable tools: Unfollow Everything rises from the grave. Hey look at this: Delights to delectate. This day in history: 2009, 2014, 2019, 2023 Upcoming appearances: Where to find me. Recent appearances: Where I’ve been. Latest books: You keep readin’ em, I’ll keep writin’ ’em. Upcoming books: Like I said, I’ll keep writin’ ’em. Colophon: All the rest. CDA 230 bans Facebook from blocking interoperable tools (permalink) Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is the most widely misunderstood technology law in the world, which is wild, given that it’s only 26 words long! https://www.techdirt.com/2020/06/23/hello-youve-been-referred-here-because-youre-wrong-about-section-230-communications-decency-act/ CDA 230 isn’t a gift to big tech. It’s literally the only reason that tech companies don’t censor on anything we write that might offend some litigious creep. Without CDA 230, there’d be no #MeToo. Hell, without CDA 230, just hosting a private message board where two friends get into serious beef could expose to you an avalanche of legal liability. CDA 230 is the only part of a much broader, wildly unconstitutional law that survived a 1996 Supreme Court challenge. We don’t spend a lot of time talking about all those other parts of the CDA, but there’s actually some really cool stuff left in the bill that no one’s really paid attention to: https://www.aclu.org/legal-document/supreme-court-decision-striking-down-cda One of those little-regarded sections of CDA 230 is part (c)(2)(b), which broadly immunizes anyone who makes a tool that helps internet users block content they don’t want to see. Enter the Knight…Pluralistic: CDA 230 bans Facebook from blocking interoperable tools (02 May 2024)