Today’s links The Coprophagic AI crisis: Even the mystical account of AI’s glorious future fails on its own terms. Hey look at this: Delights to delectate. This day in history: 2004, 2009, 2014, 2019, 2023 Upcoming appearances: Where to find me. Recent appearances: Podcasts, events and more. Latest books: You keep readin’ em, I’ll keep writin’ ’em. Upcoming books: Like I said, I’ll keep writin’ ’em. Colophon: All the rest. The Coprophagic AI crisis (permalink) A key requirement for being a science fiction writer without losing your mind is the ability to distinguish between science fiction (futuristic thought experiments) and predictions. SF writers who lack this trait come to fancy themselves fortune-tellers who SEE! THE! FUTURE! The thing is, sf writers cheat. We palm cards in order to set up pulp adventure stories that let us indulge our thought experiments. These palmed cards – say, faster-than-light drives or time-machines – are narrative devices, not scientifically grounded proposals. Historically, the fact that some people – both writers and readers – couldn’t tell the difference wasn’t all that important, because people who fell prey to the sf-as-prophecy delusion didn’t have the power to re-orient our society around their mistaken beliefs. But with the rise and rise of sf-obsessed tech billionaires who keep trying to invent the torment nexus, sf writers are starting to be more vocal about distinguishing between our made-up funny stories and predictions (AKA “cyberpunk is a warning, not a suggestion”): https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2023/11/dont-create-the-torment-nexus.html In that spirit, I’d like to point to…Pluralistic: The Coprophagic AI crisis (14 Mar 2024)